Virtual Worlds and Imagination

According to the faithful Wikipedia: The concept of virtual worlds predates computers. In fact, it can be traced to the Roman naturalist Gaius Plinius, more commonly known as Pliny the Elder, who expressed one of the earliest recorded interests in perceptual illusion.^[9][10] In the twentieth century, the cinematographer Morton Heilig explored the creation of the Sensorama, a theatre experience designed to stimulate the senses of the audience—vision, sound, balance, smell, even touch (via wind)--and so draw them more effectively into the productions^[11]

I'm not particularly into the whole computer game paraphernalia, but I like the idea of virtual world applied to theatre. Applying to the senses.

This doesn't even have to apply to strictly theatre, but consider, the details of daydreaming. The details of vision, sound, balance, smell, even touch draw you into the production of your imagination

Vision:

 Day dreams often attempt a sort of realism that differ from just regular dreaming or even theatrics in theatre. Instead, day dreams are taking things that can actually happen in real life. Okay, sometimes they are outlandish, but this is from my perspective. 

Sound:

 A realistic day dream is usually formulated by realistic dialogue. 

Balance: Could this really happen? Imagining that a building is going to fall on the kid who talks too much is less realistic than imagining myself throwing a pencil at him. 

Touch:

If I'm daydreaming about being outside instead of in class, I'm imagining the warm air versus the frigid temperature in Comer.

Virtual worlds also hold mysticism. Its cool to think of the unrealistic things one could do in a virtual world. ..wait, there's not that much difference..

The internet is a virtual world where people can create themselves to be anything they want in a sort of illusion-ed society. 

Vision: people construct "rules" to dictate how they think a website society should be ran.. e.g. Wikipedia 5 Pillars.

Sound: 

Dialogue exists for the interwebs.

Touch: A little more difficult to engage in touch, but webcams and audio make "in person" contact illusion.

Okay, so why is this important? I guess it's kind of stressing the difference of interaction through media. It all began with books, then radio, then television and now this monster of the internet combines all of these medias into one. 

The interesting concept of virtual worlds involves the creativity of imagination.
The construction of a world that mimics real life reminds me of Inception and the influence of creative thinking.

Lorem Ipsum: Formatting for Meaning

 Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit.

•  In malesuada est et leo rutrum feugiat. 
• Fusce eget nisi id augue cursus venenatis vel sit amet orci. 
• Aliquam at odio at mauris convallis viverra sed pellentesque lacus. 
• Vestibulum vel consequat turpis. Curabitur dictum orci et nunc auctor semper.
•  Suspendisse et feugiat neque. Phasellus nunc mauris, sollicitudin auctor fermentum vel, volutpat sit amet tortor. 
• Nam massa nunc, luctus at sagittis sed, sollicitudin nec nisl.
•  Vivamus dignissim molestie consectetur. 
• Aenean auctor pharetra libero, id auctor risus vestibulum eget. 
• Morbi ligula metus, sodales viverra egestas quis, feugiat vitae sapien.
•  Ut accumsan consequat neque, nec auctor diam aliquet ut. 
• Ut erat justo, blandit ac egestas vel, dapibus nec felis.
•  Nulla varius est non velit cursus tincidunt. Proin et diam non odio hendrerit tempor quis vel nunc. 

 
Praesent vestibulum urna imperdiet sapien condimentum nec lobortis dolor iaculis.

• Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. 
• Phasellus at justo at est placerat vestibulum eget nec arcu. 
• Aliquam quis ipsum mi. Pellentesque tincidunt eros sit amet tellus mattis fermentum ac a ante. 
• Praesent vitae justo non lectus tempor elementum sed quis tortor. 
• Integer condimentum ullamcorper molestie. 
• Nam tempor pellentesque neque a pharetra. 
• Aliquam eget quam orci, at ultricies tortor.
•  In ut sapien elementum est lobortis malesuada.
•  Vivamus mattis laoreet volutpat.
•  Maecenas mattis egestas dolor, vel iaculis diam lobortis id.
•  Nam pretium porta mauris, in malesuada justo semper et.
•  Ut ac turpis id sapien facilisis imperdiet sagittis ut ligula.
•  Ut ac mollis turpis. Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus.  

Curabitur ultrices, dui id semper pretium, justo augue tristique orci, quis porttitor urna dui quis nunc.

•  Sed nec purus ac diam egestas placerat at a dolor.
•  Class aptent taciti sociosqu ad litora torquent per conubia nostra, per inceptos himenaeos. 
• Integer nec sapien ac purus lobortis varius eget ac massa. 
• Mauris gravida cursus nisi, quis sagittis sem egestas sit amet. 
• Vivamus ligula urna, eleifend eget tristique nec, laoreet in augue. 
• Suspendisse elementum felis ac leo hendrerit malesuada. 
• Nunc dignissim varius dui, a dictum lectus commodo ut. 
• Fusce at ornare justo.
•  Donec condimentum est in urna luctus vitae dictum risus dignissim. 

Praesent ultricies, turpis vitae congue posuere, eros sapien fermentum odio, id volutpat purus nibh ac lacus. 

• Nunc ac volutpat nulla. 
• Maecenas placerat dapibus nisi, sit amet bibendum orci faucibus ac.
•  Aenean risus augue, blandit nec eleifend id, imperdiet laoreet quam. 
• Aliquam id libero ac metus vehicula cursus.
•  Integer et rhoncus libero. 
• Integer adipiscing tincidunt mauris. 
• Curabitur fermentum, sem vel lacinia commodo, magna libero convallis neque, at lobortis mi odio congue turpis. 
• Ut sit amet ligula elit. 

 
Donec facilisis magna et felis ullamcorper aliquet.  

• Mauris sit amet facilisis lectus. 
• Proin erat arcu, rhoncus eu tincidunt et, faucibus id justo.
•  Proin mattis porta lectus vel rhoncus. 
• Maecenas vel ligula metus.
•  Pellentesque ultrices vestibulum quam, id ullamcorper turpis faucibus ac.
•  Fusce et lectus leo. 
• Maecenas laoreet, libero ac fermentum pulvinar, tellus felis ullamcorper mi, quis faucibus ligula nibh in sapien. Sed lectus velit, auctor sit amet commodo ac, fringilla sit amet erat.
•  Fusce a cursus turpis. 
• Proin suscipit dapibus risus sagittis placerat.
•  In hac habitasse platea dictumst.
•  Integer at nunc risus. 
• Duis convallis faucibus odio quis volutpat.
•  Nulla consequat nulla quis arcu imperdiet sed imperdiet tellus tempor.

The Professional and the Blogosphere

Are blogs a public space?

In today's society, yes.

That being said, there are obviously many different types of blogs and their content determines how much they contribute to the public.

Blogging has allowed for people to share their opinions in a way that classical journalism cannot cover.

Journalists cover specific topics, cover the story, give just the facts, and then move on.

Bloggers can delve into a topic that they find interesting and devote an entire blog to that content.

The question of whether blogging should be considered a "public space" relies heavily on information literacy and the ability of readers to verify, understand and debunk what they read.

Information literacy can be defined here.

Now that you're information literate: 

The accessibility of blogs makes them appealing to a large audience while their specificity allows for even the most eclectic of tastes to find a niche in the "blogosphere"

The world of "blogosphere" creates open audience interaction in a universe driven by specific topics.

Blogs are the new mode of journalism. While people still read newspapers and magazines, blogs are just more accessible for today's generation.

Other modes of writing present and idea and readers are left to discuss it among themselves.

Blogs have allowed for the reader to be an active part of the reading process.

In Andrew O'Baoill's article "Into the Blogosphere" he highlights an important aspect of the multifaceted perspectives of bloggers. 

People searching for viewpoints on a topic of their choice will have the opportunity to see every group's position on that topic, not just the views of the major groups. In effect, the nets have become a sort of virtual village green, on which any idea can be discussed and addressed on its merits. (Rash, 1997, p. 100)

One of the drawbacks to blogging, according to O'Baoill , concerns the emergence of "professional bloggers." If someone can be considered a professional and someone else is just a blogger, who is more credible?

A major concern of deconstructing this question relies on the writer’s knowledge. Another concern questions the difference between a blogger and simply a new form of multimedia for journalists.

The biggest contributor to the discussion of "blogospheres" as public space is, of course, directed by money.

If a blog is backed by major monetary contributors is it more professional? My next question is: what is considered professional?

Does getting paid to do something make you a professional? If so, then I'm a professional Barista at Starbucks, I’m a professional tutor, and a Professional secretary for the University of Montevallo.

This concept is ridiculous. Sometimes, jobs are simply jobs, and sometimes a blog is just a blog.

If someone is posting 1000 pictures on a blog about their love for cats, I don’t consider them a cat expert.

I love cats to death, but I most certainly don’t consider myself a cat medical expert or even a major source of knowledge. I’m an avid cat fancy reader and know some basic cat owner advice for hairballs, but if something is legitimately wrong with your cat, I hope you don’t consult a cat lover blog, and that instead you call the vet.

I think this concept is that today’s generation is lazy and instead of actively associating with real life people, they cling to the internet a virtual pool of information. The internet is great, but experiencing real life is the true expression of knowledge.

I think that’s the biggest problem with the older generations’ frustration toward blogs and the internet: they don’t understand the technology  because it is a passive way to contribute information.  

Is professional something that requires levels of management and outside control?

I'm not getting paid to write a blog, therefore my work is not considered equal to MSNBC's professional bloggers even though I'm about to graduate college with a bachelor’s degree?

Money is a major factor in what can be considered professional. I think blogs are a new facility in multimedia that will create another development in modern journalism.  The blog is no more outrageous than the invention of television or radio. People are always going to be frightened by the emergence of new technology when it is applied to society.

Online Identities

Online identity has been an issue for my generation. In an age of information literacy, today's world also has to evaluate the validity of online personas.
Thirty years ago, hackers were not that big of a deal. The information they "hacked" gave rise to modern technology that we have today. Thirty years ago, bullying, abductions, and stolen identities were problems that occurred in real life, not cyber space. Online identities have allowed people to mask their identities in order to gather information or be a flat out creep.

Online identity is not a bad thing in every aspect.
Online identity has given way to every day people to create interesting personas based on hobbies, interests, education, or other characteristics that give advice, inspiration, or amusement.

One of my favorite things to do is Google questions.
I'm not talking about "Why is the sky blue?" or other knowledgeable information. Sometimes I like to ask ridiculous things, perhaps if my love life is suffering I can Google "How to make your dating life interesting again" and come up with all of these self-help articles. One of my favorites leads me to what things in dreams mean and other psychological themed issues. The response is often a number of online personas answering these questions whose whole cyberspace "life" is devoted to what different things found in dreams symbolize. Some of these people are insane, their biography section talks about how connected they are to people in the afterlife, or perhaps they are practicing witchcraft. Not all online identities are strange or bad.

Organizations also have online identities. My sorority Alpha Delta Pi portrays a professional and historical presence.

Universities organize their webpages to entice viewers' interest of their University.

The Ku Klux Klan online looks like a big club of rednecks barbecuing while wearing sheets. Beware of researching them, some of their websites gave my computer a virus during a research project one time.



Online identity can be truthful, misleading, or as insane as the person behind the computer screen wishes.

I think the biggest problem with online identities is that it makes the internet a potentially misleading and distrustful place.
Lifetime movie network has a number of movies that portray the dangers of trusting online identities.
There is the typical one where a dumb high school girl tries to meet up with some secret admirer on instant messaging and then it's like a 60 year old killer.
There is the ever so popular bullying case movies where a girl kills herself or something drastic happens because somebody at school has a fake online ID and "tortures" her.

Why is this such a problem? Thirty years ago, our parents were concerned with us getting kidnapped and talking to strangers. Now, we're concerned with what kids are looking at online, who they are "talking" to, and the potential for their friends to actually be a case of stolen identity.

Criminals had to get smarter with the age of technology, therefore, instead of lurking in the shadows, they are hiding behind masks of familiar faces.

Why does society focus so heavily on the negative online identities?
What is required for an identity to be considered legitimate and trustworthy?

The answer seems to rely on identities being backed up by organizational presence. For example, news networks who have twitter accounts appear very legitimate.
John Travolta tweeting seems further removed because he probably pays people to tweet for him.
As a person in Alabama, I don't have the pleasure of seeing John Travolta strutting down Main Street to believe he'd tweet about certain issues.

I'm more likely to believe in the online identity of James Spann.
[The local weather man for Birmingham area, this interjection is for our professor who luckily has yet to experience James Spann's extreme weather reporting during 'Nater season.]

Online identities also provide the space to release the internal personality that exists in our writing.

This “self” perhaps can more easily discuss a topic through text than in person.

Perhaps that is why online bullying is such a problem in our youth. 

For me, this online “self” allows more of my humor than I can portray in real life circumstance. I’m often thinking something I’m not saying, but online identity sees no reason to hold back because I don’t care if you’re actually laughing when you read this.

Wouldn’t it be really creepy if online identity revealed your “true” self? For example, people that hack, and bully and steal identities are just bad people?

I’m not sure, I have no ability to judge the actions of others. 

Rhetoric Remix

Charlie Sheen and Intellectual Property

When I think about the term Intellectual Property, a "Violent Torpedo of Truth" illumines one central figure in my mind:  Charlie Sheen.
A little research on Google including the terms: Charlie Sheen and Intellectual Property will surely bing you a couple hours of entertainment.
According to an article from the Washington College of Law: Intellectual Property Brief, a general list of ridiculous trademarks was compiled:

A general list of trademarks that Sheen’s company has applied for. Well, here it is, and here’s how I found it[i]:

1. VIOLENT TORPEDO OF TRUTH
2. CHARLIE SHEEN
3. SURPRISE. THAT’S WHAT WINNERS DO
4. PARK YOUR NONSENSE
5. YOU’VE BEEN WARNED
6. I AM NOT BI-POLAR, I AM BI-WINNING
7. DEFEAT IS NOT AN OPTION
8. LIVING THE SHEEN DREAM
9. GODDESS SUITE
10. WARLOCK LOUNGE
11. ADONIS DNA
12. TORPEDO OF TRUTH
13. SHEEN’S GODDESSES
14. S¢K
15. WINNING
16. SOBER VALLEY LODGE
17. VATICAN ASSASSIN
18. TIGER WATER
19. ROCK STAR FROM MARS
20. DUH, WINNING
21. TIGER BLOOD
22. TIGER PLASMA
23. SHEEN’S KORNER

Eric Perrott, the author of this article describes how Charlie Sheen's company legitimized their trademarks:

When Sheen’s company applied for these trademarks, they blanketed the “goods and services” section with a wide variety of possible uses, including “NON-MEDICATED HAIR, SKIN AND NAIL PREPARATIONS,” “PUBLICATIONS . . . FEATURING SPORTS,” and “LINENS AND BEDDING.” Don’t get too concerned about seeing “Vatican Assassin” bed sheets in the near future – if the trademarks are approved, the exact uses will be determined later by Sheen’s group, and only the goods and services where he uses the trademark in commerce will actually be protected.

 

 Charlie Sheen is obviously an extreme example of Intellectual Property. Most things that are under the question of "intellectual property" are actually legitimate ideas that need patents so people don't steal ideas and become millionares off of poor Bobby Joe's amazing idea. I understand the necessity of the Intellectual property age, but I think this Charlie Sheen stunt definately highlighted that our age has gone a little overboard in determining who "owns" this or that. If Sheen can coin a term as vague and reoccuring as "Winning", who owns other words? I'm particularly fond of cats, so can I own the rights to all things " cat " ?  YOU'VE BEEN WARNED, I'm about to present to you a TORPEDO OF TRUTH:   In today's world, people can own language and symbols.

My biggest question is where this ownership ends. For example, if I owned all things cat, do I own your cat? Do I own partial profits to people making cat toys? Should people be paying me money to have, talk, or make things cat related?
If Charlie Sheen owns the word "winning", when a football team wins, does he get some sort of trophy, too?

Also, I can't really blame the man, he was constantly in the press with people being so obsessed about what and who he was doing. If people were going to be so fully involved in his buisness, can't he decide what about him he owns, whether it be his catch phrases or the way he lives his life?

This being said, I'm certainly not siding with Sheen and saying that he should be able to own language, I'm just saying I don't protest his actions that, no doubt, stemmed from all the crap he was getting.

The right to claim ownership in language is the conquest of a new world. Instead of countries setting out to place governments in a place, countries are sending governments to claim langauge and the manipulation of language.

 Sheen's a little bit of genious, if you ask me, becasue I feel like he realizes the ridiculous nature of trademarking phrases, words, etc, but he has the money to do it, and people are stupid enough to have a process to allow it to happen!


Have you ever considered the idiot who established a process to go through to make it possible to get the rights to something like a word or phrase? Some group of lawyers were sitting around thinking, "Someday someone is going to try to own words, let's have a process so that we can deal with this."
And realistically, they were geniouses too, because right now intellectual property is a big deal. I guess it's because we have the leisure time to think about these kinds of affairs. I suppose it's just the advancement of times, like centuries ago when people didn't really spend that much time debating "What is life?" because they were too busy trying to survive.
In the age of technology, we're no longer just trying to survive, but rather we are claiming land and giving it new names because we have nothing better to do.
So now it matters if that check mark on a brand of clothing MEANS something or if it's a design.

Intellectual property seems to boil down to one thing, what can be owned?
The question of who can own is answered easily: anyone with enough money. Therefore, Sheen is laughing all the way to the bank. SURP.RISE. THAT'S WHAT WINNERS DO.